|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Le Gouvello, Raphaela; Hochart, Laure-elise; Laffoley, Dan; Simard, Francois; Andrade, Carlos; Angel, Dror; Callier, Myriam; De Monbrison, David; Fezzardi, Davide; Haroun, Ricardo; Harris, Alasdair; Hughes, Adam; Massa, Fabio; Roque D'Orbcastel, Emmanuelle; Soto, Doris; Stead, Selina; Marino, Giovanna. |
| To meet the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi Target 11 on marine biodiversity protection and Aichi Target 6 on sustainable fisheries by 2020, as well as the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 on food security and SDG 14 on oceans by 2030, there is an urgent need to rethink how best to reconcile nature conservation and sustainable development. This paper argues for effective governance to support processes that apply principles of sustainable development and an ecosystem approach to decide about economic activities at sea such as aquaculture. It describes opportunities, benefits and synergies between aquaculture and MPAs as a basis for wider debate. The scope is not a comprehensive analysis of aquaculture and MPAs, but rather to present examples... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Aquaculture; Ecosystem approach; Environmental impact assessment; Littoral; Marine protected area; Ocean; Sublittoral. |
| Ano: 2017 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00398/50969/51848.pdf |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Quetier, Fabien; Regnery, Baptiste; Levrel, Harold. |
| French regulations concerning the mitigation of development impacts have been progressively strengthened with offsets now required for impacts on forests, wetlands, and protected species, among others. In 2012, following a national consultative process called Grenelle de l’Environnement, legal requirements in terms of monitoring and effective implementation of measures aimed at avoiding, reducing and offsetting impacts were strengthened. This has created strong “demand” for offsets. The workability of these new requirements has come under scrutiny, not least because of their strong legal and financial implications for developers. In this context, official government guidance on implementing the mitigation hierarchy was published in 2012. Under this... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: No net loss; Biodiversity offsets; Ecological compensation; EU Habitats Directive; European biodiversity strategy; Environmental impact assessment; Ecological equivalencies; France. |
| Ano: 2014 |
URL: http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00168/27924/27267.pdf |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Wilson, Jeff; Hinz, Shawn; Coston-guarini, Jennifer; Maze, Camille; Guarini, Jean-marc; Chauvaud, Laurent. |
| his viewpoint article examines Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practices in developed and transitioning nations, identifies weaknesses, and proposes a new quantitative approach. The literature indicates that there exists little to no standardization in EIA practice, transitioning nations rely on weak scientific impact analyses, and the establishment of baseline conditions is generally missing. The more fundamental issue is that the “receptor”-based approach leads to a qualitative and subjective EIA, as it does not adequately integrate the full measure of the complexity of ecosystems, ongoing project risks, and cumulative impacts. We propose the application of a new framework that aims to ensure full life cycle assessment of impacts applicable to any... |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Environmental impact assessment; Ecosystem modeling; Hydrodynamic modeling; Baseline survey; Ecosystem-based environmental assessment; Environmental sensing technology. |
| Ano: 2017 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00416/52781/53661.pdf |
| |
|
|
|
